About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
Conference paper
Checking assignments of controls to risks for Internal Control
Abstract
It has become a more important role in society to manage Internal Control in industry while improper activities by well-known corporations are revealed one after another. Financial Instruments and Exchange Law is promulgated on June 14th, 2006, to impose documentation of financial reporting on Japanese listed companies. To document financial reporting, each company has to evaluate control activities in administrative work-flows. Evaluation is to check if control activities in administrative workflows prevent or mitigate latent risks properly. The decision-making criteria for evaluation depend on the evaluator and are not seen explicitly. This causes lack of consistency of evaluation. To avoid inconsistency, the decision-making criteria for the evaluation should be specified precisely. In this paper, we propose a decision-making criterion for evaluation and show how evaluation can be done with it. Evaluation with precisely defined decision-making criteria raises reliability of financial reporting. This research is helpful to construct an e-Government system for evaluations of business processes for Internal Control. Copyright 2008 ACM.