Xiaozhu Kang, Hui Zhang, et al.
ICWS 2008
A Journal article entitled 'Is APL a viable programming language?' (Earnshaw, 1975), seemed to answer its question with a Yes. This article, written by an APL enthusiast, suggests the answer should have been No, not because APL is not viable, but because it is not a programming language. This suggestion is supported by an examination of what APL is, and of what programming is. The conclusion is drawn that programming, in the occupational sense, should be distinguished from calculation, and that APL is suited to calculation but not to programming. © 1978 The British Computer Society.
Xiaozhu Kang, Hui Zhang, et al.
ICWS 2008
Victor Valls, Panagiotis Promponas, et al.
IEEE Communications Magazine
Corneliu Constantinescu
SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications 2009
Renu Tewari, Richard P. King, et al.
IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging 1996