C.A. Micchelli, W.L. Miranker
Journal of the ACM
The paper focuses on finding the m best solutions to combinatorial optimization problems using Best-First or Branch-and-Bound search. Specifically, we present m-A*, extending the well-known A* to the m-best task, and prove that all its desirable properties, including soundness, completeness and optimal efficiency, are maintained. Since Best-First algorithms have memory problems, we also extend the memory-efficient Depth-First Branch-and-Bound to the m-best task. We extend both algorithms to optimization tasks over graphical models (e.g., Weighted CSP and MPE in Bayesian networks), provide complexity analysis and an empirical evaluation. Our experiments with 5 variants of Best-First and Branch-and-Bound confirm that Best-First is largely superior when memory is available, but Branch-and-Bound is more robust, while both styles of search benefit greatly when the heuristic evaluation function has increased accuracy. Copyright © 2012, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. All rights reserved.
C.A. Micchelli, W.L. Miranker
Journal of the ACM
Saurabh Paul, Christos Boutsidis, et al.
JMLR
Joxan Jaffar
Journal of the ACM
Cristina Cornelio, Judy Goldsmith, et al.
JAIR