Eye gaze tracking using an active stereo head
David Beymer, Myron Flickner
CVPR 2003
Although a plethora of research articles on AI methods on COVID-19 medical imaging are published, their clinical value remains unclear. We conducted the largest systematic review of the literature addressing the utility of AI in imaging for COVID-19 patient care. By keyword searches on PubMed and preprint servers throughout 2020, we identified 463 manuscripts and performed a systematic meta-analysis to assess their technical merit and clinical relevance. Our analysis evidences a significant disparity between clinical and AI communities, in the focus on both imaging modalities (AI experts neglected CT and ultrasound, favoring X-ray) and performed tasks (71.9% of AI papers centered on diagnosis). The vast majority of manuscripts were found to be deficient regarding potential use in clinical practice, but 2.7% (n = 12) publications were assigned a high maturity level and are summarized in greater detail. We provide an itemized discussion of the challenges in developing clinically relevant AI solutions with recommendations and remedies.
David Beymer, Myron Flickner
CVPR 2003
Jannis Born, Tien Huynh, et al.
J. Chem. Inf. Model.
Sailesh Conjeti, Amin Katouzian, et al.
Medical Image Analysis
Yiting Xie, Deepta Rajan, et al.
SPIE Medical Imaging 2021